ANCA   Scenic Byways   Site Map   Search   Contact Us

Adirondack North Country Association

 

 
    Alliance Guiding Principles

Blueprint Process

Blueprint Points:
1. Aquatic and Terrestrial Invasive Species

2. Acid Rain

3. Global Climate Change

4. Main Street Revitalization

5. Water, Sewer and Storm-water Infrastructure

6. Marketing and Entrepreneurial Development

7. High-Speed Telecommunications

8. Workforce/Community Housing

9. Transportation Infrastructure

10. Energy

11. Effective Governance and Policy Framework

12. Land Use Change

13. Property Taxes

14. Primary Healthcare Crisis

Appendix
Procedures and Schedule

Founding Sponsors

Alliance Core Team

July 2007 Forum Participant List

BLUEPRINT FOR THE BLUE LINE

THE COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE
FEBRUARY 2008

BLUEPRINT POINTS


11. EFFECTIVE GOVERNANCE AND A POLICY FRAMEWORK
RATIONALE:The Adirondack Park Agency (APA) Act and Land Use Plan, which regulate land uses and development densities, have not been substantially amended since they were adopted in the early 1970’s. Approved local land use plans, one of the mandates of the original APA Act, have been adopted in only 19 of the Park’s 103 towns and villages, in part due to a lack of resources for local planning.
In addition, a myriad of governmental agencies have Adirondack Park oversight responsibilities directed from various levels, often attempting to regulate the same or similar functions. The Department of Environmental Conservation splits the Park into two administrative regions which often demonstrate different management philosophies and practices. Likewise, the Departments of Health, Education, Transportation, Economic Development, and others, all have differing jurisdictional regions that overlap the Park, resulting in bureaucratic inefficiencies and a lack of clear guidelines and information for business, residential and community development. The delivery of social services, local planning, and management of the Park's natural resources is fragmented and ineffective in many aspects.

SUGGESTED ACTION:
  • Create a task force with broad geographical representation from the public and private sectors at the local, county and regional level to address the interactions of local communities with governmental agencies that directly affect the Park. Engage the public to provide input on economic, community and environmental issues, and to resolve existing conflicts in ways which will provide long-term benefits for the Park and its people.
  • Undertake comprehensive Park-wide planning, focusing on the points in the Blueprint.
  • Adequately fund the Adirondack Park Local Government Review Board to actively participate in the APA processes.
  • Support local planning to address Adirondack communities’ future infrastructure and economic development capacity with necessary coordination at the county and State levels. Consider a circuit rider model for communities without access to grant writers.
  • Identify expert groups to disseminate the information on Smart Growth, policies and regulations that affect development in the Park.

12. LAND USE CHANGE
RATIONALE: A major debate continues about additional land acquisition for the Forest Preserve, conservation easements on private lands that eliminate future development rights, and concerns for the economic survival of local communities. Today, 56%of the Adirondack Park’s lands are protected, between conservation easements on 767,000 acres of large private land-holdings (13%), and 2.6 million acres of publicly owned Forest Preserve lands (43%). The Nature Conservancy’s recent acquisition of 161,000 acres of Finch Pruyn forest lands increases the concerns of local communities that are “land-locked” by State lands; in extreme cases, State lands comprise more than 90% of a town’s lands, hindering future expansion.
Even though the State pays property taxes on Forest Preserve lands, many communities are asking, “How much protected land is enough?” Conversely, several second home subdivisions and other developments are proposed for resource management land use areas that were originally zoned to protect working forests and farms, raising environmental concerns.

SUGGESTED ACTION:
  • Undertake an independent assessment of public and private lands management and development to determine what has and has not worked well, and where improvements are needed.
  • Provide the Adirondack Park Agency (APA) with resources and direction for comprehensive long-term planning, including analysis of major ecological, environmental, economic, and social trends. Pass a “finer filter” over the public and private lands of the Park to identify the areas most critical for the protection of its ecological integrity and biological diversity, and those areas more suited for recreation and development uses.
  • Provide State-level technical experts and financial resources to update on a periodic basis the APA Act, Land Use and Development Plan, and State Land Master Plan (SLMP).
  • Consider the creation of a Park-wide land bank or exchange program for specific projects of public utility (e.g., water supplies, power lines, road safety, affordable community housing, etc.) that may use Forest Preserve lands.
  • Develop land use policies based on scientific information from organizations that undertake scientific research on critical issues.
  • Complete all Unit Management Plans (UMPs) using ecosystem-based management principles, and common-sense approaches to address community needs, and review UMPs on a timely basis as per the legislative requirement.
  • Provide additional human and financial resources to properly manage State lands and to enforce existing regulations.

page 10